header-logo header-logo

19 September 2014
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insurance—Reinsurance

Amlin Corporate Member Ltd and others v Oriental Assurance Corporation [2014] EWCA Civ 1135, [2014] All ER (D) 54 (Aug)

Following the loss of a vessel and its cargo during a typhoon in the Philippines, the claimant reinsurers sought negative declarations regarding the construction of a “typhoon warranty” in the reinsurance policy between them and the defendant insurer of the vessel. The judge allowed the application due to breaches of the terms of the warranty with the consequence that the claimants were not liable under the terms of the policy. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the defendant’s appeal, finding that the judge had not erred in his construction of the warranty, nor had he erred in his conclusion, on the evidence, as to the route that the vessel’s master had intended to take in breach of the warranty.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll