header-logo header-logo

22 August 2014 / Alison Wright
Categories: Features , Insurance surgery
printer mail-detail

Insurance surgery: Driving forward

Alison Wright examines new consumer law implications for motor insurers & policyholders

The Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988) entitles an insurer to a declaration if it issues proceedings for a declaration within three months of the commencement of proceedings in which judgment is given and proves that the policy was obtained “by the non-disclosure of a material fact”.

“Material” is defined as “of such a nature as to influence the judgement of a prudent insurer in determining whether he will take the risk, and, if so, at what premium and on what conditions”.

Insurers often want an application to be made to obtain a statutory declaration that the motor insurer is entitled to void a contract of insurance with the policy holder on the basis of non-disclosure of material fact, commonly a failure to disclose previous driving convictions. In circumstances whereby the insurer would not have entered into the contract (or not in the same terms) if aware of the non-disclosure they are entitled to void the policy on the grounds of misrepresentation.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll