header-logo header-logo

22 August 2014 / Alison Wright
Categories: Features , Insurance surgery
printer mail-detail

Insurance surgery: Driving forward

Alison Wright examines new consumer law implications for motor insurers & policyholders

The Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988) entitles an insurer to a declaration if it issues proceedings for a declaration within three months of the commencement of proceedings in which judgment is given and proves that the policy was obtained “by the non-disclosure of a material fact”.

“Material” is defined as “of such a nature as to influence the judgement of a prudent insurer in determining whether he will take the risk, and, if so, at what premium and on what conditions”.

Insurers often want an application to be made to obtain a statutory declaration that the motor insurer is entitled to void a contract of insurance with the policy holder on the basis of non-disclosure of material fact, commonly a failure to disclose previous driving convictions. In circumstances whereby the insurer would not have entered into the contract (or not in the same terms) if aware of the non-disclosure they are entitled to void the policy on the grounds of misrepresentation.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll