header-logo header-logo

11 August 2023 / James South
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Opinion , ADR , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Integrated mediation: the next step

133392
Widespread use of mediation could make a valuable contribution to resolving many disputes before the county courts: James South suggests thinking big to reap its rewards

The government announcement of 25 July 2023 is significant: to integrate commercial mediation in contested claims under £10,000 in the county court in England and Wales. However, in its submission to the Ministry of Justice on the call for evidence on mandatory mediation back in 2021, the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR) drew on 30 years of experience of mediating and running court-based systems in the UK, as well as assisting other countries to develop mediation within their own court systems, to advocate going further in integrating mediation into the civil justice system, rather than just applying it to small claims.

Mediators know first-hand that human beings largely like to avoid conflict, and that we have been conditioned to hand over disputes to the civil justice system. In this context, the state to date has only provided one option for resolution: adversarial litigation,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll