header-logo header-logo

17 August 2012
Issue: 7527 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Intellectual property

Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft v Round and Metal Ltd and another [2012] EWHC 2099 (Pat), [2012] All ER (D) 47 (Aug)

Properly construed, Art 110(1) of Council Regulation (EC) 6/2002 would not prevent registration of designs of component parts of complex products. It followed that Art 110(1) of the Regulation would operate as an exception to the right conferred by registration in particular circumstances of use of the design. The burden would lay on the defendant to establish that the exception applied. Further, Art 110(1) of the Regulation would be interpreted as being restricted to component parts which had been dependent on the appearance of the complex product. The language of Art 110(1) of the Regulation directed attention to what the part would normally be used for.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll