header-logo header-logo

02 July 2021 / Masood Ahmed
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

International arbitration: widening the circle

52132
Masood Ahmed provides guidance on taking evidence from non-parties in international arbitration
  • A Court of Appeal decision has provided authority on the application of s 44(2)(a) of the Arbitration Act 1996, which provides the court with the power to order the taking of evidence from a non-party to an arbitration.

Section 44(2)(a) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) provides the court with the power to order the taking of evidence from a non-party to an arbitration so that it can be adduced in an arbitration that is being conducted in a foreign jurisdiction. As well as s 44(2)(a), the other powers of the court under s 44(2) include the preservation of evidence; orders in respect of property which is subject to the proceedings; the sale of goods that are subject to the proceedings; and the granting of interim injunctions and appointing receivers. In the case of A and another v C and others [2020] EWCA Civ 409, [2020] All ER (D) 135 (Mar), the Court of Appeal provided

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll