header-logo header-logo

International arbitration: widening the circle

02 July 2021 / Masood Ahmed
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail
52132
Masood Ahmed provides guidance on taking evidence from non-parties in international arbitration
  • A Court of Appeal decision has provided authority on the application of s 44(2)(a) of the Arbitration Act 1996, which provides the court with the power to order the taking of evidence from a non-party to an arbitration.

Section 44(2)(a) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) provides the court with the power to order the taking of evidence from a non-party to an arbitration so that it can be adduced in an arbitration that is being conducted in a foreign jurisdiction. As well as s 44(2)(a), the other powers of the court under s 44(2) include the preservation of evidence; orders in respect of property which is subject to the proceedings; the sale of goods that are subject to the proceedings; and the granting of interim injunctions and appointing receivers. In the case of A and another v C and others [2020] EWCA Civ 409, [2020] All ER (D) 135 (Mar), the Court of Appeal provided

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll