header-logo header-logo

19 February 2009 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

International Rescue

Part two: Khawar Qureshi QC reflects on the growth of public international law in the English courts

In the first part of this series I covered the “sanctions cases” where public international law (PIL) was engaged (see NLJ, 13 February 2009, p 223). In this part, the key cases during 2008 relating to Iraq/Afghanistan, and cases concerning civil sovereign immunity are considered.

 

/ cases

 

Gentle

In R (on the application of Gentle and another) v The Prime Minister and others [2008] UKHL 20 the House of Lords (constituted by nine law lords) was asked by the mothers of two soldiers who died in Iraq (in March 2003 and June 2004 respectively—the latter after the United Nations Security Council had passed a resolution providing legal cover for the coalition forces in Iraq), to determine whether ss 1 and 2 of the Human Rights Act 1998 read together with Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) required

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll