header-logo header-logo

18 April 2019 / Laura Davidson
Issue: 7837 / Categories: Features , Mental health , Technology
printer mail-detail

Internet & social media use: a tangled capacity web

How can mental capacity be assessed in the online sphere? Laura Davidson examines two recent rulings in the Court of Protection

  • Two recent Court of Protection cases consider mental capacity and consent through the lens of internet and social media use.

The Court of Protection was recently propelled into the technological present, with two linked cases focusing for the first time on internet and social media use by adults with learning disability. Re A (capacity: social media and internet use: best interests)  [2019] EWCOP 2, [2019] All ER (D) 124 (Feb) and Re B (capacity: social media: care and contact)  [2019] EWCOP 3, [2019] All ER (D) 125 (Feb) involve the sensitive topic of capacity to consent to sexual relations, and address the minefield of ‘insidious threats posed by… those who prey on the wider vulnerabilities of the young, the learning disabled, the needy and the incautious’ through ‘mate crime’ (online befriending with abusive intent) (Re A , para [4]). The court sought the right balance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll