header-logo header-logo

Intimidation can be ‘part of everyday life’ at Bar

13 October 2020
Issue: 7906 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Bullying, discrimination and harassment at the Bar are widespread, a study commissioned by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has found

Experiences varied between sexual harassment, unfair treatment on the basis of protected characteristics, long-term bullying, unreasonable work demands, belittling comments and unfair work allocation. Low to medium-level incidents were the most common, particularly for people from underrepresented groups. The study uncovered a ‘shared sense’ that a barrister who wasn’t white, male and from a ‘high social grade’ was less likely to be recommended by clerks, given work by senior barristers or employed by solicitors.

In the report, 'Bullying, Discrimination and Harassment at the Bar', published this week barristers pointed out that the Bar is ‘an environment in which power is key, and the ability to dominate over other people in order to win an argument is crucial.

‘In this environment, bullying and intimidation are rife, and often seem like part of everyday life at the Bar.’ Participants said ‘this culture of bullying and aggression is often a learned behaviour pattern―many were bullied or victimised themselves as young barristers, and therefore can feel it is the norm to act this way’.

Such behaviour can have long-term consequences, such as diminished self-esteem, anxiety, health complications, lowered earning capacity and disruption of professional relationships.

Pupil barristers were the most vulnerable, participants said. Even the architecture of the Bar, with ‘warrens of small rooms and poorly lit courtyards’ producing a ‘conspiratorial’ atmosphere made it easier for bullying to happen.

The study, by YouGov, involved telephone interviews with 30 barristers and five non-barristers who had directly experienced or observed bullying, discrimination and harassment at the Bar.

However, most barristers interviewed had not formally reported their experiences, mainly due to fears for their reputation at work and future career.

The study called for a shift in culture at the Bar to encourage openness and discourage inappropriate behaviour, with a role for the BSB, Bar Council and professional networks in driving change.

BSB head of equality and access to justice, Amit Popat, said: ‘It is plain from the study that there are significant cultural factors, including power imbalances, which inhibit the reporting of bullying and harassment.’

 

 

Issue: 7906 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll