header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Inventor’s ‘outstanding benefit’ worth £2m

A professor who invented a device vital to diabetes treatment has won a landmark patent case on the determination of ‘outstanding benefit’.

In a unanimous ruling this week, the Supreme Court held Professor Shanks is entitled to compensation under the Patents Act 1977, s 40, on the basis the patents for the product he invented in 1982 have been of outstanding benefit to his employer and he is entitled to a fair share of that benefit, in Shanks v Unilever Plc [2019] UKSC 45.

Professor Shanks initially received a salary of £18,000 and a Volvo car for his work on biosensors, during which he conceived a system for measuring the glucose concentration in blood, serum or urine. He built the prototype at home using Mylar film and slides from his daughter’s toy microscope kit and bulldog clips to hold the assembly together. He accepts the rights to his inventions were owned by his employer, which sold them to Unilever for £100. The Shanks patents would later be worth more than £19m, and Unilever’s total earnings from the patents were about £24m.

The court considered the meaning of ‘outstanding benefit’ and what percentage of earnings should be allocated.

Giving the lead judgment, Lord Kitchin held it was fair to apply a 5% share of the £24m, which gave Professor Shanks £2m.

He said the statutory test required the benefit to be ‘outstanding’, which is ‘an ordinary English word meaning exceptional or such as to stand out and it refers here to the benefit (in terms of money or money’s worth) of the patent to the employer rather than the degree of inventiveness of the employee’. In determining the ‘benefit’ to Unilever, Lord Kitchin said the court must consider what is the employer’s undertaking for this purpose, and ‘what is the relevance of that undertaking’s size and nature?’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll