header-logo header-logo

19 March 2020 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7879 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Involuntary manslaughter

17909
Gross negligence manslaughter: when is there a serious & obvious risk of death? Simon Parsons examines the evidence
  • It is unclear whether the courts want to reduce or expand the scope of the gross negligence manslaughter.

Involuntary manslaughter is unlawful homicide without the mens rea for murder but with some lesser degree of mens rea or negligence. A person need not being acting involuntarily to be liable for this form of manslaughter. One head of liability is gross negligence manslaughter which will be prosecuted where the defendant’s act is lawful in itself or where death is the result of a failure to act. It is a common law offence which has been shaped by the judges over many years.

The high authority for the offence is Adomako [1995] 1 AC 171 in which the House of Lords restated the law which was first set out in Bateman (1925) 19 Cr App R 8. This stabilised the offence and there was little judicial development of the offence after Evans [2009]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll