header-logo header-logo

01 October 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Ionic Legal—Tania D’Souza Culora

Brand protection and IP disputes expertise strengthened with partner hire

Ionic Legal has welcomed Tania D’Souza Culora as a partner in London, strengthening its contentious intellectual property and brand protection offering. Her arrival takes the number of partners at the specialist IP and IT law firm to five in just over a year, reflecting its rapid growth since launching in 2024. The firm has also expanded geographically, opening a new office in Winchester alongside its existing bases in London and Manchester.

D’Souza Culora brings more than 20 years’ experience in contentious IP matters with a particular focus on brand protection and global anti-counterfeiting strategies. She has advised clients across sectors including technology, fashion, luxury goods, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. Dual-qualified in Ontario and England & Wales, she was most recently a co-founder of boutique IP practice Seastone, having previously been a partner in the IP group at Gowling WLG. Like Ionic’s co-founders, she began her career at Baker McKenzie in London.

Commenting on her appointment, Paul Cox, co-founder of Ionic Legal, said: ‘When we launched Ionic Legal last year, we knew we wanted to attract the brightest and best talent in IP to join us and we are delighted to welcome Tania to the firm. Her experience will complement and deepen our expertise in our core areas of trade mark prosecution, litigation and anti-counterfeiting. She is also someone we have known for 25 years and shares our core values.’

Alongside partner-level growth, the firm has recruited additional paralegal talent, welcoming Jordan Carter and Isabel Shaw-Smith in recent weeks, with Sarah Walker set to join in early October. The appointments mark the latest stage of expansion for Ionic Legal, which continues to advise many of the world’s largest brands on both contentious and non-contentious IP and IT matters.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll