header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007 / Laurence Kaye
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

IP for the digital age

Laurence Kaye considers the impact of the Gowers review from the perspective of UK copyright

 The long-awaited Gowers Review on Intellectual Property (the review) was published on 6 December 2006 and brought welcome attention to the UK’s knowledge-based and creative industries. One of the main goals of the review was to evaluate the current UK intellectual property (IP) system and determine whether laws drafted in the 19th century were fit for the digital economy. The review concluded that the current system was capable of managing IP rights in the digital age, but this was a qualified endorsement. Although the review found the system to be “broadly performing satisfactorily”, it proposed 58 recommendations which identified areas of necessary reform.

Many of the recommendations can be welcomed without reservation, especially in the areas of education, enforcement of rights, a more strategic role for the Patent Office, cheaper and more efficient IP litigation procedures, and the promotion of mediation as a dispute resolution mechanism.
However, there are other proposals which, if implemented, or implemented wrongly, could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll