header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007 / Laurence Kaye
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

IP for the digital age

Laurence Kaye considers the impact of the Gowers review from the perspective of UK copyright

 The long-awaited Gowers Review on Intellectual Property (the review) was published on 6 December 2006 and brought welcome attention to the UK’s knowledge-based and creative industries. One of the main goals of the review was to evaluate the current UK intellectual property (IP) system and determine whether laws drafted in the 19th century were fit for the digital economy. The review concluded that the current system was capable of managing IP rights in the digital age, but this was a qualified endorsement. Although the review found the system to be “broadly performing satisfactorily”, it proposed 58 recommendations which identified areas of necessary reform.

Many of the recommendations can be welcomed without reservation, especially in the areas of education, enforcement of rights, a more strategic role for the Patent Office, cheaper and more efficient IP litigation procedures, and the promotion of mediation as a dispute resolution mechanism.
However, there are other proposals which, if implemented, or implemented wrongly, could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll