header-logo header-logo

09 June 2016 / Gurvir Birang
Issue: 7702 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

IPs take a hit

Finally, a level playing field in insolvency, says Gurvir Birang​

On 6 April 2016, insolvency law was brought into line with other areas of commercial and civil litigation. Its exemption from the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO), ss 44 and 46 was finally removed. This means that successful claimants who enter into a conditional fee agreement (CFA) can no longer recover success fees or after-the-event (ATE) insurance from the losing party.

Those of us who defend bankruptcy claims welcome this news, which ensures that the Jackson reform’s aims of rebalancing costs and discouraging unnecessary court cases apply evenly across all areas of civil litigation.

Concern over insolvency practitioners’ (IPs’) fees has been raised for some time. In a report to the Insolvency Service in 2013, Elaine Kempson highlighted that concerns continue to be raised over the remuneration of IPs (Review of Insolvency Practitioner Fees; Report to the Insolvency Service). In 2015 the Insolvency (Amendment) Rules came into force, stating that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll