header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Iraq Detention

Human Rights

The UK government is responsible for its human rights abuses in Iraq and cannot pass the buck to the UN, the House of Lords has ruled. In R (on the application of Al Jedda) v Secretary of State for Defence a 4:1 law lord majority said the UK government was responsible for detaining a UK/Iraqi national in Basra without trial, rejecting the government’s contention that UK forces in post-conflict Iraq were acting under the authorisation of UN Security Council Resolution 1546—which permits internment of suspects in Iraq. The law lords held that the defendant’s right to liberty under Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights was “qualified but not displaced” by the resolution.

Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll