header-logo header-logo

Is Brexit a Russia-backed coup?

24 January 2020 / David Wolchover , Amanda Robinson
Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail
Amanda Robinson and David Wolchover discuss whether the ‘Russia Report’ has been suppressed to conceal evidence of serious interference

After not far short of half a century of the closest cooperation with our nearest neighbours, a new era of political and economic estrangement from them is about to begin. There have been 70 glorious years of peace, development and teamwork within the EU, much of which will be undone in one defining act: Brexit. The puzzling question, since 2016, has asked why the United Kingdom would opt to become permanently poorer by relinquishing what has been labelled our ‘Germany Plus’ deal, the UK’s membership terms negotiated by Margaret Thatcher in 1984 which have given us ‘opt outs’ and a rebate placing us in a far more advantageous position than any other member country (see George Osborne: Brexit would leave UK ‘permanently poorer’ and HM Treasury analysis: the immediate economic impact of leaving the EU).

The advisory EU referendum of 2016 resulted in a wafer-thin, statistically insignificant, 3.8% Leave majority

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll