header-logo header-logo

24 January 2020 / David Wolchover , Amanda Robinson
Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Is Brexit a Russia-backed coup?

Amanda Robinson and David Wolchover discuss whether the ‘Russia Report’ has been suppressed to conceal evidence of serious interference

After not far short of half a century of the closest cooperation with our nearest neighbours, a new era of political and economic estrangement from them is about to begin. There have been 70 glorious years of peace, development and teamwork within the EU, much of which will be undone in one defining act: Brexit. The puzzling question, since 2016, has asked why the United Kingdom would opt to become permanently poorer by relinquishing what has been labelled our ‘Germany Plus’ deal, the UK’s membership terms negotiated by Margaret Thatcher in 1984 which have given us ‘opt outs’ and a rebate placing us in a far more advantageous position than any other member country (see George Osborne: Brexit would leave UK ‘permanently poorer’ and HM Treasury analysis: the immediate economic impact of leaving the EU).

The advisory EU referendum of 2016 resulted in a wafer-thin, statistically insignificant, 3.8% Leave majority

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll