header-logo header-logo

Is Brexit a Russia-backed coup?

24 January 2020 / David Wolchover , Amanda Robinson
Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail
Amanda Robinson and David Wolchover discuss whether the ‘Russia Report’ has been suppressed to conceal evidence of serious interference

After not far short of half a century of the closest cooperation with our nearest neighbours, a new era of political and economic estrangement from them is about to begin. There have been 70 glorious years of peace, development and teamwork within the EU, much of which will be undone in one defining act: Brexit. The puzzling question, since 2016, has asked why the United Kingdom would opt to become permanently poorer by relinquishing what has been labelled our ‘Germany Plus’ deal, the UK’s membership terms negotiated by Margaret Thatcher in 1984 which have given us ‘opt outs’ and a rebate placing us in a far more advantageous position than any other member country (see George Osborne: Brexit would leave UK ‘permanently poorer’ and HM Treasury analysis: the immediate economic impact of leaving the EU).

The advisory EU referendum of 2016 resulted in a wafer-thin, statistically insignificant, 3.8% Leave majority

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher Ireland LLP—Dermot McEvoy

Fieldfisher Ireland LLP—Dermot McEvoy

Dublin disputes team announces strategic partner appointment

DWF—four appointments

DWF—four appointments

Firm strengthens in-house advocacy with four new pupil appointments

Shakespeare Martineau—Fergus Spowart & Fin Campbell

Shakespeare Martineau—Fergus Spowart & Fin Campbell

Scottish practice expands with new solicitor hire and trainee qualification

NEWS
MPs have expressed disappointment after the government confirmed it will not consider updating the parental leave system until at least 2027
In his latest 'Civil way' column for this week's NLJ, Stephen Gold delivers a witty roundup of procedural updates and judicial oddities. From the rise in litigant-in-person hourly rates (£24 from October) to the Supreme Court’s venue hire options (canapés in Courtroom 1, anyone?), Gold blends legal insight with dry humour
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
Writing in NLJ this week, Nick Brett and Vicky Lankester of Brett Wilson dissect the chronic failures of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in meeting disclosure obligations. From the Post Office scandal to the collapsed trial of Liam Allan, they highlight how systemic neglect has led to wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice
Lord Neuberger, former president of the Supreme Court, shares his views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in this week's NLJ with William Raven
back-to-top-scroll