header-logo header-logo

Is Rwanda agreement lawful?

02 September 2022
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
The UK–Rwanda partnership is not legally binding, has not been subject to scrutiny by Parliament, and fails to protect asylum-seekers’ rights, the Law Society has warned

Giving evidence to the House of Lords International Agreements Committee last week, the Law Society highlighted that the UK would be unable to protect an asylum seeker’s human rights. It warned people would be given insufficient notice or time to get legal advice about their removal―just 14 days, or seven days if in immigration detention.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said monitoring bodies referred to in the agreement have not been set up and there were few details. Moreover, Boyce said there was a risk individuals removed by the UK might face persecution in Rwanda or be returned to their country of origin, breaking the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees prohibition on ‘refoulement’.

The Committee, chaired by Baroness Hayter, is conducting an inquiry into the memorandum of understanding between the UK and Rwanda for an asylum partnership agreement.

Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll