header-logo header-logo

10 February 2021 / Veronica Cowan
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Opinion , Conveyancing , Property
printer mail-detail

Stamp duty: is the holiday (almost) over?

38841
Veronica Cowan quizzes experts on the pressure faced by the property sector as the end of the stamp duty holiday looms

With the stamp duty holiday deadline looming, buyers are rushing to complete their transactions before 31 March, and the pressure has led to a backlog, with research suggesting large numbers of buyers will withdraw from their purchases if they miss the deadline. The government’s initial response to calls for an extension was to state that the measure was designed as temporary relief to stimulate market activity, and support jobs that rely on the property market. After an online petition calling for the tax break to be lengthened received more than 140,000 signatures, a virtual House of Commons debate took place earlier this month; despite an extension of the stamp duty holiday being met with cross-party support, the government declined to commit to this, with no further decisions expected until the budget announcement on 3 March. There are also calls to abolish the tax altogether.

Breaking the chain

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll