header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 March 2021 / Robin Kingham
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Is your settlement agreement unenforceable?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
42828
Robin Kingham provides an update on the status of Tomlin Order settlements in relation to consumer credit law
  • Gertner—a long running case involving a guarantee, a strike-down of an IVA, and a bankruptcy petition—has had a major impact on consumer credit law.
  • Litigators will need to consider this judgment carefully in order to ensure that any proposed settlement agreement does not inadvertently become subject to consumer credit regulation.

Significant consumer credit cases generally start as relatively small matters in the county court and gradually work their way up through the High Court to the Court of Appeal and, exceptionally, to the Supreme Court. The recent Court of Appeal decision in CFL Finance Ltd v Laser Trust & Gertner [2021] EWCA Civ 228, [2021] All ER (D) 115 (Feb) was very different.

Background

Mr Gertner was sued on a personal guarantee that he had given for a company loan. He defended the claim for the principal debt of £1.7m on the basis that the lender’s director

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll