header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Island records

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
16 May 2014 / Nigel Sanders
Issue: 7606 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
web_sanders

Nigel Sanders provides an offshore perspective of litigation funding
With access to justice a growing issue in many jurisdictions, this article provides a broad overview of the latest positions and trends in each of Jersey, Guernsey, the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands (BVI) in relation to litigation funding.

 

Jersey

In Jersey, the Royal Court has recognised the principles that underlie recent changes and reforms in England regarding litigation cost. Against that backdrop, the court has held that third-party litigation funding is permissible, in appropriate circumstances. The Royal Court first confirmed in In re Valetta Trust [2012] (1) JLR 1 (a non-adversarial trustee application concerning the funding of a breach of trust claim) that Jersey law and English law on champerty are no different. It held that third party funding agreements are in principle enforceable as a matter of public policy as they enhance access to justice. Following Valetta in Barclays Wealth Trustees (Jersey) Limited as trustee of the R2R Bulgaria Property Fund & Others v Equity Trust (Jersey) Limited & Others [2013]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quillon Law—Neil Dooley

Quillon Law—Neil Dooley

Disputes firm expands fraud and investigations practice with partner hire

Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff

Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff

Firm strengthens corporate tax and incentives team with partner hire

Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett

Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett

Partner and senior associate join pensions team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When high rates fall flat
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
NLJ this week: Building digital bridges to justice
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Delegation or dereliction?
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
NLJ this week: FCA faces its toughest test yet
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
NLJ this week: Instructing the right expert
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll