Should all workers be extended the same floor of rights, asks Charles Pigott
Michael Zander QC does not support the Court of Appeal’s decision in Mitchell
David Burrows addresses the issue of set aside orders
Cathy Kelly is a living, breathing case for structured settlements, says Richard Fraser
Jim Sharkey & Helen Mulcahy analyse a raft of recent fraud cases
Kaneria v The England and Wales Cricket Board Ltd [2014] EWHC 1348 (Comm), [2014] All ER (D) 45 (May)
R (on the application of Andrews) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2014] EWHC 1435 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 72 (May)
R (on the application of Newby Foods Ltd) v Food Standards Agency (No 7) [2014] EWHC 1340 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 49 (May)
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Birketts—Nathan Evans
Commercial and technology team in Cambridgestrengthened by partner hire
Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta
Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department
Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale
Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return
From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed
