header-logo header-logo

Funding rise

16 May 2014
Issue: 7606 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Third party litigation funding is on the rise both here and offshore—with the Jackson reforms cited for the increase in interest in its use in the UK.

Susan Dunn of Harbour Litigation Funding says that in the last 18 months, litigation funding—where an unconnected third party pays a claimant’s legal costs in return for a share of the proceeds if the case is successful—has been embraced by practitioners across the board.

Meanwhile, the use of third party litigation funding in offshore jurisdictions is also on the rise, according to Nigel Sanders, partner at law firm Ogier, with Jersey and Guernsey both holding that it is permissible, in appropriate circumstances. Its use—particularly of claims by liquidators—is also becoming more prevalent in the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands.

Issue: 7606 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll