header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Hole in the floor

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
16 May 2014 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7606 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
web_pigott_1

Should all workers be extended the same floor of rights, asks Charles Pigott

Recent cases have shown that despite the steady growth in workers’ rights some significant gaps in protection remain.

These developments add force to calls for a coherent floor of rights for all individuals engaged in the labour market who are not running their own business.

Non-employee workers enjoy a far greater range of employment protection rights than they did 20 years ago. For the most part they have benefited from the significant extension of protection against discrimination and new legislation on working time, the national minimum wage and whistleblowing as well as a number of other measures. However, the increasing fluidity of the labour market continues to throw up examples of employment arrangements which leave the individual involved without any effective rights. Three diverse appeal cases provide recent illustrations of how this can happen.

Who is a worker?

Before moving on to the cases, a quick reminder of the definition of worker. In the key legislation, the basic requirement involves

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
NLJ this week: Pro bono power without the red tape
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: DNA evidence—justice on ice?
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll