header-logo header-logo

16 May 2014
Issue: 7606 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tobacco giant cracks e-cigarette market

Tobacco giant British American Tobacco (BAT) is fighting back against government proposals which could cost the industry millions of pounds by muscling in on the e-cigarette craze.

A subsidiary of BAT has become the first tobacco company in 20 years to screen an advertisement on British TV screens. Although the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency announced last year that it would regulate e-cigarettes and other nicotine containing products as medicines, a proposed e-cigarette licensing regime cannot come into force until the European Commission’s Tobacco Products Directive is implemented in 2016. Until then, e-cigarettes are subject to general product safety legislation, which means, in the words of the EU health commissioner (October 2013), they are less well regulated than “shower gel or a bar of soap”.

This temporary lacuna in the law is clearly one that embattled tobacco firms intend to exploit. Writing for NLJ this week, Sarah Moore, a solicitor in the product liability team at Leigh Day says: “It appears that while one marketing door may be closing for ‘big tobacco’ another is being left wide open.”

 

Issue: 7606 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll