header-logo header-logo

16 May 2014 / Richard Fraser
Issue: 7606 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Taking care

web_advert

Cathy Kelly is a living, breathing case for structured settlements, says Richard Fraser

Cathy Kelly hasn’t spoken for more than a quarter of a century. Yet despite her silence, her every breath is an eloquent argument for structured settlements. In 1989, she was catastrophically injured in a head-on car crash. In July that year, the High Court awarded her Britains first ever structured settlement, the precursor to periodical payment orders (PPOs).

The accident left her husband dead, and Cathy in what was described in court as a persistent vegetative state requiring 24-hour care.

At the time medical opinion differed widely on projections of Cathy’s life expectancy, with estimates ranging from 10 to 20 years. In the event she confounded their predictions and, 25 years on, Cathy still lives near her family in a nursing home in Bury, Lancashire.

First of its kind

When her case came to court, all severe injury claims were settled on a lump sum basis.

My firm provided expert financial advice to the team that represented Cathy. Our calculations showed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll