header-logo header-logo

Is it good to talk?

04 October 2013
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers’ telephone technique loses them clients

A mystery shopping exercise among law firms of all sizes has revealed a catalogue of telephone inefficiencies, missed business opportunities and inappropriate comments. 

In more than a third of 254 “mystery calls”, neither party knew who they were talking to because the caller’s name was not taken and the call handler did not introduce themselves.

In 97% of the calls, the call handler failed to either ask if the caller wanted to go ahead or make an appointment. 93% of firms called during lunchtime either had nobody available to deal with the enquiry or were closed with a recorded message.

Telephone bloomers include one call handler who told a potential client: “Yes, a broken ankle is a very good injury…and if you are lucky, it will develop complications and you can claim more.”

Another potential clients was told: “If it’s a quote you want for a will, you should know we don’t do cheap wills. You see the problem with doing cheap wills is that there is very little profit on it, until people die and often it’s a long time before that happens.”

The research, by Ian Cooper, a business development consultant for the legal profession, included interviews with senior management in 92 law firms about strategy.

Cooper found that 70% of firms made no attempt to formally track and monitor incoming new enquiry calls and conversion rates, and nine out of 10 people who dealt with incoming potential client calls admitted to not liking it or not being good at it.

However, 90% of firms who trained their staff in how to deal with potential clients benefited from at least a 10% improvement in conversion rates within a month.

Cooper said: “It is quite amazing that at a time of massive competitive pressure and changes in the legal sector, law firms have not yet fully embraced the importance of converting their leads into profitable business. Most firms don’t have a proper strategy and have simply not switched on to the fact that this is a high priority area, which is costing them business.”

Issue: 7579 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll