header-logo header-logo

13 September 2012
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Jackson jobs anxiety

ACL survey predicts redundancy wave across PI firms

The Jackson reforms are likely to trigger a wave of redundancies across “demoralised” personal injury firms when they come into force in April.

Some 62% of claimant personal injury firms say they expect to make staff redundant as a direct result of the reforms, according to a snapshot survey of 50 firms conducted by the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL). Only one in 10 firms say for sure they will not.

Lord Justice Jackson’s reforms to civil litigation, which include abolishing recoverability of success fees in “no win, no fee” cases, will be introduced by Pt 2 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 and are due to begin next April.

The majority of claimant lawyers responding to the ACL survey say they expect to lose work and make less profit as a result of the reforms.

More than two-thirds of respondents think the reforms will make their firms less willing to take on riskier cases, while more than three-quarters predict they will have less work, and 84% believe they will make less profit.

Nine out of 10 lawyers say they expect competition to drive down success fees once they are no longer recoverable from the other side. The survey also revealed confusion over who would pay for after-the-event insurance—the client, the solicitor or a mixture of the two.

Iain Stark, chair of the ACL, says: “It is easy for the public and policymakers to be indifferent to the impact of the Jackson reforms on claimant lawyers, but the responses to our survey indicate a demoralised group of people who will not be able to hold open the door so that injured people can access justice.”

Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll