header-logo header-logo

Jackson Masterclass: The myths demolished

27 March 2013 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Features , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan & Paul Reason sketch out a true picture of the post-Jackson world

Tosh! The word is apt to describe some of the nonsensical and erroneous ideas doing the rounds. Our aim is to paint as accurate a picture as possible of how the litigation world will change come 01 April 2013.

“Costs lawyers are in danger of extinction”

  • Nothing could be further from the truth. Budgeting will be the norm in multi-track cases although it will not apply to commercial or admiralty work. His Honour Judge Simon Brown QC has recently recorded a training talk for the Judiciary in which he makes it clear that the task of creating a plausible budget is a double act performed by the litigator in collaboration with their costs lawyer.
     
  • It is essential for each party to produce a viable budget. Get it wrong and the risk is that costs otherwise recoverable will be disallowed. When interviewed for NLJ last spring Lord Justice Jackson said
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll