header-logo header-logo

03 August 2017
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Jackson’s capped costs pilots will ‘bring access to justice’

Lord Justice Jackson’s capped costs pilot will bring ‘greater access to justice’, the president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) has said.

The opt-in pilot, proposed this week in Jackson LJ’s Review of Civil Litigation Costs, will apply to business and property disputes worth up to £250,000. It will run for two years in London Mercantile Court and the Mercantile, TCC and Chancery courts in Manchester and Leeds.

The pilot aims to streamline court procedure, lower costs, increase the certainty of costs exposure and speed up resolution of claims. Jackson LJ said the parties would be able to rely on documents contained in the bundle, with no disclosure ordered as a general rule.

Ed Crosse, LSLA president and disputes partner at Simmons & Simmons, said: ‘The capped costs pilot will involve the adoption of established and widely endorsed fast track procedures, which, with robust case management, should provide greater procedural efficiency and certainty to the litigation process.

‘This should, in turn, reduce the work (and associated legal costs) that currently has to be incurred by parties under the existing Civil Procedure Rules. For example, under this voluntary pilot, the presumption that a party will be entitled to wide ranging disclosure, extensive evidence and a lengthy trial is reversed. Instead, parties opting into the scheme can expect to have their cases heard within just eight months of the first case management conference, with limited disclosure and evidence, and with a trial lasting no more than two days.’

Crosse said the LSLA believes the scheme should remain voluntary beyond the duration of the pilot.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll