header-logo header-logo

Jackson’s judicial review roadshow

15 March 2017
Issue: 7738 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lord Justice Jackson’s latest fixed costs roadshow has provided further indications that he may row back from his initial support for fixed recoverable costs in all cases valued at up to £250,000.

Jackson LJ began his review into fixed costs in November, and is conducting a series of seminars to gather facts.

However, lawyers voiced their concerns about fixed costs in judicial review cases at Jackson LJ’s latest seminar, at the Law Society’s London headquarters this week.

City Law School’s Professor Dominic Regan, who advised Sir Rupert on his 2010 review of civil justice costs, and who attended the seminar, said: “It was obvious that there was no appetite for fixed costs in judicial review work.

“Again and again, random members of the audience spoke with one voice. The staggering breadth of judicial review work was not regarded as capable of capture by a rigid costs regime.

“However, much was said in praise of the Aarhus Convention model enshrined in CPR 45.41–44. This imposes a limit on the amount of adverse costs. [Jackson LJ] may not then be proposing as radical a fixed costs landscape as he initially envisaged in his January 2016 opening proposals.”

In a progress report on his review, released earlier this month, he restated his support for lower value cases but said he had “an open mind” about what types and level of cases should fall within such a regime. He is due to complete his review by 31 July 2017. 

Issue: 7738 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll