header-logo header-logo

Jackson’s judicial review roadshow

15 March 2017
Issue: 7738 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lord Justice Jackson’s latest fixed costs roadshow has provided further indications that he may row back from his initial support for fixed recoverable costs in all cases valued at up to £250,000.

Jackson LJ began his review into fixed costs in November, and is conducting a series of seminars to gather facts.

However, lawyers voiced their concerns about fixed costs in judicial review cases at Jackson LJ’s latest seminar, at the Law Society’s London headquarters this week.

City Law School’s Professor Dominic Regan, who advised Sir Rupert on his 2010 review of civil justice costs, and who attended the seminar, said: “It was obvious that there was no appetite for fixed costs in judicial review work.

“Again and again, random members of the audience spoke with one voice. The staggering breadth of judicial review work was not regarded as capable of capture by a rigid costs regime.

“However, much was said in praise of the Aarhus Convention model enshrined in CPR 45.41–44. This imposes a limit on the amount of adverse costs. [Jackson LJ] may not then be proposing as radical a fixed costs landscape as he initially envisaged in his January 2016 opening proposals.”

In a progress report on his review, released earlier this month, he restated his support for lower value cases but said he had “an open mind” about what types and level of cases should fall within such a regime. He is due to complete his review by 31 July 2017. 

Issue: 7738 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll