header-logo header-logo

04 August 2017 / Manus Egan
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Jackson tribute act tells pier to beat it

Manus Egan looks at the equitable doctrine of laches, in the context of a pier entertainment dispute

  • The doctrine of laches can be a valuable defence against restrictive covenants.

The case of Legends Live v Harrison [2016] EWHC 1938 (QB) concerned an application to enforce a restrictive covenant against a Michael Jackson tribute act in Blackpool. The equitable defence of laches was successfully relied upon, and the meaning of ‘employment business’ considered.

The Legends contract

The claimant company, whose principal business was acting as an employment business, produced a show called Legends at a venue called The Sands in Blackpool. It was a multi-tribute show featuring a number of acts by performers, each appearing in the character of a different famous artist. The defendant was a Michael Jackson tribute performer, who performed under a contract for the summer 2015 season. The contract contained a covenant that the defendant would not compete on any other lookalike or soundalike shows in Blackpool for a period of 12 months from the final date

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
Refusing mediation need not trigger a costs penalty, but litigators must justify their position
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
back-to-top-scroll