header-logo header-logo

22 May 2017
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Wheeler—Bolt Burdon Kemp

jonathan-wheeler_bbk

Firm appoints new managing partner

 

Bolt Burdon Kemp has announced the appointment of Jonathan Wheeler as its new managing partner.

Jonathan is recognised as being among the profession's very top personal injury lawyers and brightest legal personalities. He is a Lawyer Hot 100 Alumnus (recognising his campaigning work for survivors of child abuse); a former APIL President; a founder member of the Law Society’s LGBT Committee—and a sometime script advisor (on legal plot lines) for a popular BBC soap.

Jonathan and the management team are planning some changes to bring clients even more into the centre of the firm's thinking. For example they are removing what is seen as an artificial boundary between the firm's personal injury and clinical negligence departments, instead grouping teams around different serious injury types such as 'adult brain injury', ‘child brain injury’ and 'spinal injury', to better reflect the way their clients identify with the injury they or their loved ones have sustained, and to ensure delivery of the highest standard of client care, specific to their clients’ needs.

Jonathan takes over the reins from Lynne Burdon, who has steered the firm to the success it enjoys today through extremely challenging times, as twists on the regulatory tourniquet around personal injury claims have come from several different directions.

Jonathan said: ‘As a partner, I have always seen my role as less about "ownership" and more about "custodianship"—responsible for looking after the BBK business and brand for future generations. Now as managing partner, I feel this all the more. I am lucky to have such an inspired team around me and look forward to working with senior colleagues to shape the firm for continuing success in the future.’

Lynne Burdon said: ‘When I first founded the firm with Roger Bolt in 1986, we had a vision for a law firm with a difference. We were passionate about righting injustice and helping improve the lives of our clients - and at the same time we wanted to create an amazing place to work where talented and professional lawyers could also have fun and follow their own dreams. Passing on the mantle to Jonathan, I'm proud of the firm we created; I have total confidence in Jonathan as the custodian of the firm's values going into the next generation; and I'm excited to see where he takes the firm next.’ 

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll