header-logo header-logo

20 January 2017 / David Hewitt
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Joseph, 1917: a lesson for us all

nlj_7730_hewitt

David Hewitt looks at a sad & maddening case from a hundred years ago

The Central Tribunal sat many times during the Great War. It had to decide whether men who were not soldiers should now be required to fight and its decisions certainly affected a great many lives. But the tribunal didn’t always do justice.

At the beginning of 1917, “Joseph” was told that he could remain at home, at least for the time being. He was given an exemption from military service by a committee of councillors in Thornton, the small town near Blackpool where he lived. But although the committee was satisfied that Joseph was a market gardener and therefore essential to the war effort, its decision soon came under fierce attack.

The Central Tribunal was the final arbiter in matters of this kind. It sat in far away Westminster and was led by the fourth Marquess of Salisbury, whose father had been Prime Minister three times and the last man to lead his government from the House of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll