header-logo header-logo

Joseph, 1917: a lesson for us all

20 January 2017 / David Hewitt
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7730_hewitt

David Hewitt looks at a sad & maddening case from a hundred years ago

The Central Tribunal sat many times during the Great War. It had to decide whether men who were not soldiers should now be required to fight and its decisions certainly affected a great many lives. But the tribunal didn’t always do justice.

At the beginning of 1917, “Joseph” was told that he could remain at home, at least for the time being. He was given an exemption from military service by a committee of councillors in Thornton, the small town near Blackpool where he lived. But although the committee was satisfied that Joseph was a market gardener and therefore essential to the war effort, its decision soon came under fierce attack.

The Central Tribunal was the final arbiter in matters of this kind. It sat in far away Westminster and was led by the fourth Marquess of Salisbury, whose father had been Prime Minister three times and the last man to lead his government from the House of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll