header-logo header-logo

Joseph, 1917: a lesson for us all

20 January 2017 / David Hewitt
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7730_hewitt

David Hewitt looks at a sad & maddening case from a hundred years ago

The Central Tribunal sat many times during the Great War. It had to decide whether men who were not soldiers should now be required to fight and its decisions certainly affected a great many lives. But the tribunal didn’t always do justice.

At the beginning of 1917, “Joseph” was told that he could remain at home, at least for the time being. He was given an exemption from military service by a committee of councillors in Thornton, the small town near Blackpool where he lived. But although the committee was satisfied that Joseph was a market gardener and therefore essential to the war effort, its decision soon came under fierce attack.

The Central Tribunal was the final arbiter in matters of this kind. It sat in far away Westminster and was led by the fourth Marquess of Salisbury, whose father had been Prime Minister three times and the last man to lead his government from the House of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll