header-logo header-logo

Joseph: a lesson for us all (Pt 2)

27 January 2017 / David Hewitt
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7731_davies_backpage_0

David Hewitt shares his reflections on a local strike with lasting impact

 

I have already written about “Joseph”—the man from Thornton, near Blackpool, who was sent to fight in the Great War by the Central Tribunal (NLJ, 20 January 2017, p 22).

That tribunal sat in Westminster and was chaired by the fourth Marquess of Salisbury, and he and his colleagues decided that Joseph was simply a hawker of fruit and veg. But their decision was controversial, because Joseph said he was actually a market gardener and a committee of councillors in Thornton had taken him at his word.

The Thornton councillors made up a “local tribunal”, of which there were more than two thousand during the war, and after conscription was introduced, in early 1916, it fell to them to decide whether men might be given an exemption from military service.

It wasn’t that Joseph didn’t want to fight—he had, in fact, already enlisted for military service—he just didn’t want to fight right now. He had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll