header-logo header-logo

Joseph: a lesson for us all (Pt 2)

27 January 2017 / David Hewitt
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7731_davies_backpage_0

David Hewitt shares his reflections on a local strike with lasting impact

 

I have already written about “Joseph”—the man from Thornton, near Blackpool, who was sent to fight in the Great War by the Central Tribunal (NLJ, 20 January 2017, p 22).

That tribunal sat in Westminster and was chaired by the fourth Marquess of Salisbury, and he and his colleagues decided that Joseph was simply a hawker of fruit and veg. But their decision was controversial, because Joseph said he was actually a market gardener and a committee of councillors in Thornton had taken him at his word.

The Thornton councillors made up a “local tribunal”, of which there were more than two thousand during the war, and after conscription was introduced, in early 1916, it fell to them to decide whether men might be given an exemption from military service.

It wasn’t that Joseph didn’t want to fight—he had, in fact, already enlisted for military service—he just didn’t want to fight right now. He had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll