header-logo header-logo

08 October 2025
Issue: 8134 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal , Media
printer mail-detail

Journalists in court bolstered by procedural update

The right of the press to report on the criminal courts received a boost this week, following an update to the Criminal Procedure Rules

From this week, the updated Criminal Procedure Rules explicitly require parties who apply for discretionary reporting restrictions in criminal cases to notify journalists of their application. The update applies to discretionary restrictions—for example, to protect vulnerable witnesses—as opposed to automatic restrictions in youth cases and certain offences.

Sayra Tekin, director of legal, News Media Association, said: ‘A clear and unequivocal requirement for parties to notify the media of reporting restriction applications will result in much greater clarity for both media and the courts, strengthening open justice.’

Georgia Jerram, chair of the HM Courts and Tribunal Service Media Working Group, said: ‘When journalists aren’t given clear and timely information about requests to the court for a reporting restriction, they are denied the opportunity to make a challenge.’

Issue: 8134 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal , Media
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll