header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Joy over tax ruling may be short-lived

News

The House of Lords’ landmark ruling in the Arctic Systems tax case may turn out to be a pyrrhic victory for family businesses after the government announced plans to change the law.

In Jones v Garnett (Inspector of Taxes) the law lords rejected an appeal by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) to impose tax on a husband- and wife-run IT consultancy retrospectively under the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988, s 660A. They ruled that Geoff and Diana Jones would not be taxed for dividends that Mr Jones paid to his wife.

HMRC claimed the pair had avoided tax on earnings by paying themselves a small salary (£7,000 for him and £4,000 for her) from Arctic Systems’ 2000–01 turnover of nearly £100,000. The amount was then split equally, less tax and expenses, in dividends.

In a ministerial statement issued this week, the government says it wants to clamp down on the tax-saving arrangement used by thousands of husband and wife businesses. However, Francesca Lagerberg of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales Tax Faculty says: “There is a danger that rushed legislation will result in unworkable legislation, plunging thousands of taxpayers into yet more uncertainty about their tax position.”

Issue: 7284 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll