header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Joy over tax ruling may be short-lived

News

The House of Lords’ landmark ruling in the Arctic Systems tax case may turn out to be a pyrrhic victory for family businesses after the government announced plans to change the law.

In Jones v Garnett (Inspector of Taxes) the law lords rejected an appeal by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) to impose tax on a husband- and wife-run IT consultancy retrospectively under the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988, s 660A. They ruled that Geoff and Diana Jones would not be taxed for dividends that Mr Jones paid to his wife.

HMRC claimed the pair had avoided tax on earnings by paying themselves a small salary (£7,000 for him and £4,000 for her) from Arctic Systems’ 2000–01 turnover of nearly £100,000. The amount was then split equally, less tax and expenses, in dividends.

In a ministerial statement issued this week, the government says it wants to clamp down on the tax-saving arrangement used by thousands of husband and wife businesses. However, Francesca Lagerberg of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales Tax Faculty says: “There is a danger that rushed legislation will result in unworkable legislation, plunging thousands of taxpayers into yet more uncertainty about their tax position.”

Issue: 7284 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll