header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Joy over tax ruling may be short-lived

News

The House of Lords’ landmark ruling in the Arctic Systems tax case may turn out to be a pyrrhic victory for family businesses after the government announced plans to change the law.

In Jones v Garnett (Inspector of Taxes) the law lords rejected an appeal by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) to impose tax on a husband- and wife-run IT consultancy retrospectively under the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988, s 660A. They ruled that Geoff and Diana Jones would not be taxed for dividends that Mr Jones paid to his wife.

HMRC claimed the pair had avoided tax on earnings by paying themselves a small salary (£7,000 for him and £4,000 for her) from Arctic Systems’ 2000–01 turnover of nearly £100,000. The amount was then split equally, less tax and expenses, in dividends.

In a ministerial statement issued this week, the government says it wants to clamp down on the tax-saving arrangement used by thousands of husband and wife businesses. However, Francesca Lagerberg of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales Tax Faculty says: “There is a danger that rushed legislation will result in unworkable legislation, plunging thousands of taxpayers into yet more uncertainty about their tax position.”

Issue: 7284 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Private client department announces partner hire

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Firm appoints first joint heads of Wales office

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Global dispute resolution team promotes two partners in Guernsey and Cayman Islands

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll