header-logo header-logo

28 May 2014
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judge treads carefully on Operation Cotton

Sir Brian Leveson “carefully avoided adding to an already bitter industrial dispute” between barristers and the Ministry of Justice when he ruled on R v Crawley (Operation Cotton), according to The Justice Gap editor and NLJ columnist, Jon Robins.

The Court of Appeal, led by Sir Brian, last week overturned Southwark Crown Court’s decision to halt the multi-million pound fraud trial due to legal aid cuts leaving the defence bereft of suitably-qualified barristers. A further eight Very High Cost Cases (VHCCs) due to take place in the coming months are likely to encounter similar problems.

Robins says: “Sir Brian warned the justice secretary and the Bar to overcome their ‘impasse’—his words.

“But how? The two sides are as firmly entrenched as they were before last week's ruling. The Bar is under huge pressure. The Ministry of Justice is apparently on a recruitment drive for the Public Defender Service in the event of future 'market failures'—just like the Army’s vintage Green Goddess fire engines in the firefighters' strike 10 years ago.

"It remains to be seen to what extent the Bar has the support of solicitors over VHCCs after the Criminal Bar Association decided to pursue its own 'separate peace' with government. More seriously, the Jeffrey review last month raised fundamental questions about the long-term 'viability' of the Bar model.”

 

Issue: 7608 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll