header-logo header-logo

05 February 2025
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Child law
printer mail-detail

Judges' safety versus open justice?

Three family judges who made historic decisions concerning Sara Sharif have been named.

In January the Court of Appeal overturned an anonymity order made by Mr Justice Williams, in Tickle & anor v The BBC & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 42. The judges concerned, Judge Alison Raeside and retired circuit judges Peter Nathan and Sally Williams, had not sought anonymity.

Ten-year-old Sara was murdered by her father and stepmother in August 2023.

Rachel Frost-Smith, family legal director at law firm Birketts, said: ‘In addition to putting a spotlight on the profoundly tragic circumstances of Sara’s short life, the case highlights the incredibly difficult work that the family court and associated professionals do in relation to children and the high stakes of the decisions that judges make.

‘This work is done against a backdrop of well publicised cuts to public funding, which brings with it heavy caseloads for professionals and judges. Family judges have been subjected to a series of attacks from disgruntled litigants (many of whom do not have access to legal advice). Other professionals have been similarly targeted, for example the staff at Great Ormond Street Hospital during the Charlie Gard case [a 2017 case concerning the life of a child with brain damage], some of whom received death threats.

‘While those making decisions should be held accountable, and procedures and protocol put in place for good reason followed, it is clearly wholly unacceptable for those judges and professionals to be attacked in any way.’

Judge Raeside has previously been the victim of stalking and harassment by a father involved in contact proceedings—the man was imprisoned and given a five-year restraining order at Bristol Crown Court in 2019. Last year, a man was imprisoned for attacking Judge Patrick Perusko, a family court judge, in Milton Keynes County Court.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll