header-logo header-logo

10 October 2013
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges behaving badly

Speedier system for complaints against judiciary

The time period for making a complaint against a judge or magistrate has been cut from one year to three months under a new, speedier system.

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office—which took over from the Office for Judicial Complaints—launched its new complaints handling service last week.

There will now be one over-arching set of regulations, with different sets of rules for courts, tribunals and magistrates.

Complaints that fall short of misconduct may be dealt with pastorally, while certain categories of cases such as criminal convictions will be dealt with under a faster, summary process. Serious complaints will be handled through a new two-tier system. If the judicial office holder faces potential removal or suspension from office, they will have a right to have the matter referred to a disciplinary hearing panel. Otherwise, there is no automatic right to a hearing but the judge or magistrate may request that the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice make a further investigation before a decision is made.

Last year, three tribunal members, 17 magistrates and one judge were removed from office, a further 19 judicial office holders were reprimanded, and 16 resigned. More than 1,000 eligible complaints were received.

Issue: 7579 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll