header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007 / Louis Flannery KC
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Judges in the dock

Hostility and animosity. Louis Flannery looks at
a shocking case of judicial bias

In February 2006, I wrote about judicial bias after the decision of the Court of Appeal in AWG Group Ltd v Morrison [2006] EWCA Civ 6, [2006] 1 All ER 967, suggesting that judges should heed the advice given by their appellate superiors (see 156 NLJ 7212, pp 278–79). In that case, Mr Justice Evans-Lombe had been told he was wrong to have refused to recuse himself after it had become apparent that he was acquainted with one of the witnesses in a case before him.

 It seems that the advice in AWG has been ignored by a prominent judge sitting in the Chancery Division: Mr Justice Peter Smith.
In Howell v Lees Millais [2007] EWCA Civ 720, [2007] All ER (D) 64 (Jul), Peter Smith J was roundly criticised for rejecting an invitation to stand down in a case. The case illustrates the danger that judges being asked to recuse themselves will not be able to view the application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll