header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007 / Louis Flannery KC
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Judges in the dock

Hostility and animosity. Louis Flannery looks at
a shocking case of judicial bias

In February 2006, I wrote about judicial bias after the decision of the Court of Appeal in AWG Group Ltd v Morrison [2006] EWCA Civ 6, [2006] 1 All ER 967, suggesting that judges should heed the advice given by their appellate superiors (see 156 NLJ 7212, pp 278–79). In that case, Mr Justice Evans-Lombe had been told he was wrong to have refused to recuse himself after it had become apparent that he was acquainted with one of the witnesses in a case before him.

 It seems that the advice in AWG has been ignored by a prominent judge sitting in the Chancery Division: Mr Justice Peter Smith.
In Howell v Lees Millais [2007] EWCA Civ 720, [2007] All ER (D) 64 (Jul), Peter Smith J was roundly criticised for rejecting an invitation to stand down in a case. The case illustrates the danger that judges being asked to recuse themselves will not be able to view the application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll