header-logo header-logo

Judges give verdict on pay

16 February 2017
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judicial Attitude Survey highlights significant disatisfaction

Judges have complained of deteriorating buildings, poor IT support, and low morale among court staff, according to the latest Judicial Attitude Survey.

More than half have concerns for their personal safety while in court, and more than one third are concerned for their safety outside of court, while 15% have concerns related to social media.

Some 78% have had a loss of net earnings in the past two years, and 62% have been personally affected by the change in pensions. Both of these issues have had a detrimental effect on morale.

The results did not bode well for the future—more than a third want to retire early during the next five years, and a further 23% are undecided. The judges identified two main factors as likely to sway them to leave the judiciary early, further limits on pay awards and reductions in pension benefits. However, 57% said an increase in workload might prompt them to leave, and more than half cited further demands for out of hours work, stressful conditions at work and reduction in administrative support as possible spurs for an early retirement.

Conversely, higher remuneration, a settled position on pensions and better administrative support would keep them in post, according to 80%, 57% and 56% of the judges, respectively. Judicial salaries range from £107,100 to £249,583.

The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas said: “The quality of the judiciary underpins the rule of law and the continued success of our legal services market nationally and internationally. We are therefore extremely grateful to those who took part in the survey, which assists the SSRB in making evidence-based recommendations to government on judicial pay.”

Issue: 7734 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll