header-logo header-logo

Judges give verdict on pay

16 February 2017
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judicial Attitude Survey highlights significant disatisfaction

Judges have complained of deteriorating buildings, poor IT support, and low morale among court staff, according to the latest Judicial Attitude Survey.

More than half have concerns for their personal safety while in court, and more than one third are concerned for their safety outside of court, while 15% have concerns related to social media.

Some 78% have had a loss of net earnings in the past two years, and 62% have been personally affected by the change in pensions. Both of these issues have had a detrimental effect on morale.

The results did not bode well for the future—more than a third want to retire early during the next five years, and a further 23% are undecided. The judges identified two main factors as likely to sway them to leave the judiciary early, further limits on pay awards and reductions in pension benefits. However, 57% said an increase in workload might prompt them to leave, and more than half cited further demands for out of hours work, stressful conditions at work and reduction in administrative support as possible spurs for an early retirement.

Conversely, higher remuneration, a settled position on pensions and better administrative support would keep them in post, according to 80%, 57% and 56% of the judges, respectively. Judicial salaries range from £107,100 to £249,583.

The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas said: “The quality of the judiciary underpins the rule of law and the continued success of our legal services market nationally and internationally. We are therefore extremely grateful to those who took part in the survey, which assists the SSRB in making evidence-based recommendations to government on judicial pay.”

Issue: 7734 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll