header-logo header-logo

18 December 2013
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Judges struck off

Denis Francis McKay & Stuart Roger Turner linked to misuse of legal aid cash

A district judge and a former deputy costs judge have been struck off the roll of solicitors for misusing £1.5m of legal aid cash.

Denis Francis McKay and Stuart Roger Turner were banned from practice at the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) this week. The tribunal ruled that they acted without integrity and abused the trust that was placed in them, acted with reckless disregard for their professional obligations and breached the Solicitors Accounts Rules.

Both solicitors were partners at Lonsdales Solicitors, based in Blackpool and Preston, at the time of the offences. McKay was a former deputy costs judge and Turner a district judge.

The tribunal heard that they deliberately, systematically and extensively failed to account to the Legal Services Commission (LSC, now the Legal Aid Authority) for at least £1.5m of public funds that had been recovered in successful litigation.

Lonsdales would receive payments from the LSC for work done for its clients. When costs for this work were recovered from the other side, Lonsdales should have returned these costs to the LSC, but failed to do so in a large number of cases. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) closed the firm in July 2011 when it discovered what was going on.

In their defence, McKay agreed that the firm owed a considerable sum of money to the LSC but said he had hoped that they could eventually repay the debt. He accepted that with hindsight he should have taken a different course of action. Turner denied having knowledge that the firm were failing to report payment of costs received from third parties.

Gordon Ramsay, SRA director of enforcement, says: “Solicitors hold positions of great trust, so it is essential that they act with integrity. 

“The public needs to know that if solicitors fail to uphold these standards they will be held to account. Legal aid is there to support access to justice—not to fund solicitors’ practices.”

 

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll