header-logo header-logo

11 July 2025 / Ben Roe
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Features , Jurisdiction , Dispute resolution , International , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Judgment day: Hague 2019

225420
Hague 2019 gives more certainty in cross-border disputes, writes Ben Roe. But will the courts pursue a consistent approach?
  • The Hague Judgments Convention 2019 came into force for the UK on 1 July 2025. It allows for quicker and easier cross-border recognition and enforcement of judgments in some cases, including with the EU.
  • Although this is a positive step for litigants using UK courts, challenges remain around the scope and application of the convention.

The Hague Conference on Private International Law stands alongside UNCITRAL and UNIDROIT as one of the three main sources of private international law. It has produced many conventions relevant to litigators, such as the Hague Service Convention and the Hague Evidence Convention.

However, it is the Hague Conference’s efforts around jurisdiction that have recently gained prominence. The Hague Judgments Convention 2019 (Hague 2019) came into force in the UK on 1 July 2025. Its roots can be traced back to the 1990s, with the formation of the Jurisdiction Project. This initiative aimed to harmonise

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll