header-logo header-logo

27 January 2011
Issue: 7450 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Judgment registration in contested case

A judgment arising out of a contested county court hearing is not registrable at the Register of County Court Judgments...

A judgment arising out of a contested county court hearing is not registrable at the Register of County Court Judgments etc—at least initially—if the claim was contested. Does this still apply if the defendant did not turn up at the trial which led to the judgment although he had filed a defence and otherwise participated in the proceedings?

Yes, it does. The filing of the defence would have rendered the claim contested for the purposes of the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/3595). The defendant’s absence from the trial does not convert the claim into an uncontested case. After all, the court might dismiss the claim on a one-sided hearing even in the defendant’s absence if the claimant’s case has not been proved to its satisfaction. It is not unknown for a defendant to file an unmeritorious defence with the sole object of prolonging registration of a judgment until enforcement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll