header-logo header-logo

27 January 2011
Issue: 7450 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Judgment registration in contested case

A judgment arising out of a contested county court hearing is not registrable at the Register of County Court Judgments...

A judgment arising out of a contested county court hearing is not registrable at the Register of County Court Judgments etc—at least initially—if the claim was contested. Does this still apply if the defendant did not turn up at the trial which led to the judgment although he had filed a defence and otherwise participated in the proceedings?

Yes, it does. The filing of the defence would have rendered the claim contested for the purposes of the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/3595). The defendant’s absence from the trial does not convert the claim into an uncontested case. After all, the court might dismiss the claim on a one-sided hearing even in the defendant’s absence if the claimant’s case has not been proved to its satisfaction. It is not unknown for a defendant to file an unmeritorious defence with the sole object of prolonging registration of a judgment until enforcement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll