header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Open or Closed

Can you please tell me whether district judges exercising insolvency jurisdiction...

Can you please tell me whether district judges exercising insolvency jurisdiction and bankruptcy registrars sit in chambers or in open court? They do not seem to be able to make up their minds about this.

Whatever the court or room in which the judge sits, they can be expected to operate on the presumption that the hearing is open to the public, subject to any application for the hearing to be conducted in private (Civil Procedure Rules 1998 r 39.2). When they do sit in private (as they will, for example, when making orders in the course of boxwork dealt with in the absence of the parties) their orders will usually describe them in the modern way as sitting “in private” although “in chambers” is also still used. The High Court cause list does not expressly refer to public or private hearings but to whether the judge will be robed or unrobed which should be of use to legal representatives who have any doubts as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll