header-logo header-logo

Open or Closed

15 January 2009
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Can you please tell me whether district judges exercising insolvency jurisdiction...

Can you please tell me whether district judges exercising insolvency jurisdiction and bankruptcy registrars sit in chambers or in open court? They do not seem to be able to make up their minds about this.

Whatever the court or room in which the judge sits, they can be expected to operate on the presumption that the hearing is open to the public, subject to any application for the hearing to be conducted in private (Civil Procedure Rules 1998 r 39.2). When they do sit in private (as they will, for example, when making orders in the course of boxwork dealt with in the absence of the parties) their orders will usually describe them in the modern way as sitting “in private” although “in chambers” is also still used. The High Court cause list does not expressly refer to public or private hearings but to whether the judge will be robed or unrobed which should be of use to legal representatives who have any doubts as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll