header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Open or Closed

Can you please tell me whether district judges exercising insolvency jurisdiction...

Can you please tell me whether district judges exercising insolvency jurisdiction and bankruptcy registrars sit in chambers or in open court? They do not seem to be able to make up their minds about this.

Whatever the court or room in which the judge sits, they can be expected to operate on the presumption that the hearing is open to the public, subject to any application for the hearing to be conducted in private (Civil Procedure Rules 1998 r 39.2). When they do sit in private (as they will, for example, when making orders in the course of boxwork dealt with in the absence of the parties) their orders will usually describe them in the modern way as sitting “in private” although “in chambers” is also still used. The High Court cause list does not expressly refer to public or private hearings but to whether the judge will be robed or unrobed which should be of use to legal representatives who have any doubts as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll