header-logo header-logo

Judicial review stats ‘incorrect’

21 April 2021
Issue: 7929 / Categories: Legal News , Judicial review , Immigration & asylum , Public
printer mail-detail
The Public Law Project (PLP) has accused the government of using ‘flawed’ statistics in the judicial review reform process.

PLP wrote to the Office for Statistics Regulation this week, urging them to examine the use of statistics in the ongoing process. It said there has been ‘multiple instances of flawed use of statistics in the process so far, perhaps most notably in relation to Cart judicial reviews’.

The government’s proposals include abolishing judicial review of Upper Tribunal appeals―the Supreme Court ruled in R (on the application of Cart) v Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28 that these judicial reviews were lawful. It claims only 12 out of 5,500 such cases (0.22%) have been successful. However, PLP says this figure is ‘entirely incorrect and misleading’ as it mixed reported and unreported cases. It said the success rate was actually 12 out of 45 reported cases (26.7%).

Joe Tomlinson, PLP research director, said: ‘The standards of the statistics being produced are, in places, flawed and misleading.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll