header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 October 2020 / Carin Hunt
Issue: 7905 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Jurisdiction & the tort gateway

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
28865
Carin Hunt provides an update on the meaning of the tort jurisdiction gateway in light of one of the longest-running jurisdiction disputes in English personal injury law

In brief

  • Brownlie v Four Seasons (No 2): a binding decision on the meaning of the tort jurisdiction gateway, for now.
  • On 29 July 2020 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Brownlie (No 2) [2020] EWCA Civ 996, which upheld the decision of Mr Justice Nicol and agreed with the majority of the Supreme Court in Brownlie (No 1), [2017] UKSC 80.

Both the facts and the central legal issue in Brownlie (No 2) are beguilingly simple. In January 2010, Lady Brownlie, together with her husband, the highly regarded international lawyer Professor Sir Ian Brownlie QC, their daughter, and two grandsons, set out on a day trip which they had booked with the Four Seasons Hotel Cairo, where they were staying. Their tour vehicle, which was in poor condition, badly maintained, and negligently driven, went off the road

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll