header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008 / Cathryn Mcgahey
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Jury out on Terror Bill

Will proposals regarding inquests in the Counter-Terrorism Bill breach human rights laws? Cathryn McGahey and Bilal Rawat investigate

In April 2005, just 11 weeks before the death of Jean Charles de Menezes, 24-year-old Londoner Azelle Rodney was shot and killed by an armed police officer. The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) subsequently referred the matter to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). In July 2006, the CPS announced that no police officers would face prosecution in relation to the death of Rodney.

Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Conventioni) imposes an obligation on the state to conduct an effective investigation into a death caused by one of its agents. To comply with Art 2, any investigation must be independent and effective, must contain a sufficient element of public scrutiny to allow accountability and must allow the next-of-kin to participate to the extent necessary to safeguard his or her interests. A coroner's inquest is one forum in which the state may discharge its investigatory obligation under Art 2.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll