header-logo header-logo

Jus cogens: a law to trump all laws?

02 February 2024 / Malcolm Bishop KC
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
156473
It’s arguably the most important rule of international law, trumping all domestic legislation. Malcolm Bishop KC examines jus cogens in the context of the Rwanda Bill
  • Jus cogens comprises peremptory norms which may not be violated by any state, even in time of war.
  • This rule of international law prohibits the facilitating or subcontracting of torture, thus making the Rwanda Bill unenforceable.

Jus cogens—what is it? A trendy health drink? A boiled sweet? No, it is a rule of international law. In fact, it is arguably the most important rule of international law. Its reach extends throughout the civilised world and trumps all domestic legislation, international agreements or treaties. Put shortly, jus cogens is a fundamental principle of international law, which is accepted by the international community of states as a norm from which no derogation is permitted, even in time of war.

Unlike ordinary customary law, which has traditionally required consent, and allows the alteration of its obligations between states through treaties, jus cogens comprises peremptory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll