header-logo header-logo

02 February 2024 / Malcolm Bishop KC
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Jus cogens: a law to trump all laws?

156473
It’s arguably the most important rule of international law, trumping all domestic legislation. Malcolm Bishop KC examines jus cogens in the context of the Rwanda Bill
  • Jus cogens comprises peremptory norms which may not be violated by any state, even in time of war.
  • This rule of international law prohibits the facilitating or subcontracting of torture, thus making the Rwanda Bill unenforceable.

Jus cogens—what is it? A trendy health drink? A boiled sweet? No, it is a rule of international law. In fact, it is arguably the most important rule of international law. Its reach extends throughout the civilised world and trumps all domestic legislation, international agreements or treaties. Put shortly, jus cogens is a fundamental principle of international law, which is accepted by the international community of states as a norm from which no derogation is permitted, even in time of war.

Unlike ordinary customary law, which has traditionally required consent, and allows the alteration of its obligations between states through treaties, jus cogens comprises peremptory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll