header-logo header-logo

14 September 2012 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Just rewards

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason provide a wills & probate update

In the recently decided case of Re JC [2012] WTLR 1211, JC had four children:

  • A, with A’s mother who was 15 when she gave birth. A was subsequently put into a children’s home and then fostered. JC denied being A’s biological father but a paternity test confirmed otherwise.
  • B and C were born following JC’s marriage to Mrs C. They divorced due to JC’s violence and aggression to all members of the family.
  • D was born almost a year after JC and Mrs C divorced (the consequence of JC raping Mrs C). D was given up for adoption as Mrs C was living in considerable poverty.

Neither B nor C had contact with JC for decades, but had been in contact in the later stages of his life. A was in contact with JC throughout his life despite JC denying paternity. D had made contact with her mother and B and C, but had never met JC (he again denied paternity).

In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll