header-logo header-logo

Justice begins at home

244936

A fair & equitable profession? Joshua Purser & Govindi Deerasinghe explore some troubling research

The legal profession is fond of describing itself as the guardian of fairness. We speak of equality before the law as if it were an agreed fact rather than a principle that must be continually defended. What the inaugural Global Justice 50/50 Report ‘Gender (In)Justice?’ makes patently clear is that the justice sector is failing to meet the standards it demands of others. Across 171 organisations assessed, the picture is consistent and troubling: power remains concentrated in the hands of a narrow demographic, and the legal profession’s internal inequities pose a direct threat to public trust.

The evidence is stark. Men still occupy 71% of top seats in global and regional courts and 80% in internationally operating elite law firms. Leadership is not only overwhelmingly male, but also overwhelmingly drawn from wealthy countries. 81% of holders of highest offices are nationals of high-income countries, while just 1% are women from low-income

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll