header-logo header-logo

Justice begins at home

244936

A fair & equitable profession? Joshua Purser & Govindi Deerasinghe explore some troubling research

The legal profession is fond of describing itself as the guardian of fairness. We speak of equality before the law as if it were an agreed fact rather than a principle that must be continually defended. What the inaugural Global Justice 50/50 Report ‘Gender (In)Justice?’ makes patently clear is that the justice sector is failing to meet the standards it demands of others. Across 171 organisations assessed, the picture is consistent and troubling: power remains concentrated in the hands of a narrow demographic, and the legal profession’s internal inequities pose a direct threat to public trust.

The evidence is stark. Men still occupy 71% of top seats in global and regional courts and 80% in internationally operating elite law firms. Leadership is not only overwhelmingly male, but also overwhelmingly drawn from wealthy countries. 81% of holders of highest offices are nationals of high-income countries, while just 1% are women from low-income

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll